Re: 22.0.99 emacs dumper (?) problem

[Chip Coldwell]

On Fri, 18 May 2007, Neal Becker wrote:

> Chip Coldwell wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I would like to bring the bug described here:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239344
> > 
> > to the attention of this mailing list.  In a nutshell, what happens is
> > that an emacs binary built using the Fedora 7 build system will
> > seg-fault immediately when run on a Fedora 7 install.  The stack trace
> > shows an assert failing in the glibc malloc code (usually it's
> > setlocale invoking malloc); it appears that something about the way
> > the dumper preserves the malloc state between the dumping emacs and
> > the dumped emacs isn't quite working.
> > 
> > Another theory that is being examined is that somewhere there is a
> > pointer to anonymous mmaped memory.  It seems that prepending
> > 
> > MALLOC_MMAP_MAX_=0
> > 
> > to this line
> > 
> > LC_ALL=C $(RUN_TEMACS) -nl -batch -l loadup dump
> > 
> > works, although there are some conflicting reports about this, also.
> > 
> > Anyway, if we could get some more eyes on this bug, it would probably
> > help a bunch.
> > 
> > Chip
> > 
> 
> This worked for me with emacs-23.0.0.1 until yesterday's update to 
> glibc-2.6-1.
> (No, I haven't rebuilt emacs today after the glibc-2.6-1 update)

Do you mean that dumping emacs-23.0.0.1 with "MALLOC_MMAP_MAX_=0"
built a binary that worked with glibc-2.5.90-22 but stopped working
after the update to glibc-2.6-1?

emacs-23 is the unicode2 branch, right?  I would assume that the
malloc hooks, dumper, lisp allocator, etc are common to the two
branches.

Chip

-- 
Charles M. "Chip" Coldwell
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
978-392-2426