Re: CVS is the `released version'

[David Kastrup]

JD Smith <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:46:42 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> I can't see how this would in any way diminuish the FSF's ability to
>> develop Emacs as an FSF-copyrighted package.  At the current point of
>> time, both pulling a (non-standardized) package into Emacs and
>> maintaining it externally is a source of pain. 
>
> Isn't that the point?  That pain may be the motivation to assign
> copyright and move a package into the mainline Emacs distribution.

Where is the point if this act is equally painful?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum