[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: socks.el to be included?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: socks.el to be included? |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:22:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Albinus <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Please fix the copyright header. The first line should probably just
>>> be removed.
>
> Fixed. Thanks for the hint, I didn't know how to handle parallel
> copyright statements.
When there are parallel copyrights, both statements need to remain.
But in Emacs, with very few exceptions, copyright is assigned to the
FSF, and the original copyright statement is no longer factually
correct.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/01
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/01
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/01
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/03
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/03
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/04
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Glenn Morris, 2007/06/04
- Re: socks.el to be included?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/04
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/05
- Re: socks.el to be included?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: socks.el to be included?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/05