[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:17:39 -0400 |
I've been using the empty-string patch for a while and I have not
observed any bad behavior.
In that case, let's install it, presuming it has been changed to
maintain the two different empty strings (one unibyte and one
multibyte). (We discussed that issue, but I don't recall whether this
change was made.)
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/05
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/05
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/05
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/06
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/08
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/08