[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new image library "requirements"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: new image library "requirements" |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:35:44 -0400 |
How is the case of image libraries different from the X headers and
libraries?
They are similar cases and should be handled the same way. Currently
the image libs are handled right, and the X headers are handled wrong.
Currently, if X headers and/or libraries were not found
by the configure script, we just print this in the summary at the end
of configure, and continue as if --without-x was specified.
I already asked people to change that.
Would someone please change that, then ack?
- Re: new image library "requirements", (continued)
- Re: new image library "requirements", Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/19
- Re: new image library "requirements", David Kastrup, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements", Jan Djärv, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements", David Kastrup, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements", Glenn Morris, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements", Jason Rumney, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: new image library "requirements", Jan Djärv, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements", Richard Stallman, 2007/06/21
- Re: new image library "requirements", Richard Stallman, 2007/06/19
- Re: new image library "requirements", David Kastrup, 2007/06/19
- Re: new image library "requirements", Nick Roberts, 2007/06/19
- Re: new image library "requirements", Jan Djärv, 2007/06/19
- Re: new image library "requirements", Nick Roberts, 2007/06/19
- Re: new image library "requirements", Jan Djärv, 2007/06/20
- Re: new image library "requirements", Richard Stallman, 2007/06/20
Re: new image library "requirements", David Kastrup, 2007/06/18