[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:25:23 +0200 |
On 6/27/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
The purpose of not having `*' presumably is to have them affect the
kill-ring. In order to provide similar behavior upon multiple kills
as in a non-readonly-buffer, it appears reasonable to move across the
(non-happening) kill.
I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean that people routinely does kill
operations on a read-only buffer in order to copy text to the kill
ring?
Uh what? Switching to overwrite-mode/binary-overwrite-mode does not
change the buffer, does it?
No. But it seems like an error to *interactively* change to
overwrite-mode in a read-only buffer, doesn't it?
Juanma
- `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, David Kastrup, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, Andreas Schwab, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, David Kastrup, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, David Kastrup, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, David Kastrup, 2007/06/27
- Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/27