[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:53:06 -0400 |
2. Wrt #2, I prefer my idea of having a user option, `visit-on-startup', to
specify the startup behavior.
I am in favor of this option -- would someone please add it?
However, that doesn't solve the problem of making *scratch* work
conveniently.
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, (continued)
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Chong Yidong, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/07/18
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Mathias Dahl, 2007/07/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Peter Lee, 2007/07/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/20
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/07/20
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Mathias Dahl, 2007/07/21
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/21
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/21