Re: Scratch buffer annoyance

[David Kastrup]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>>> That variable name is misleading because the value is not a buffer.
>>>> Please change the variable name to one that fits the meaning.
>>> 
>>> I don't see a better name.  Maybe, `initial-display-buffer' or
>>> `initial-current-buffer'?
>
>> `initial-buffer-name'
>
> Since it's not a name, that's probably not the best choice either.
> How 'bout initial-buffer-content?  initial-buffer-target?
> initial-buffer-specification?

startup-item

-- 
David Kastrup