Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards?

[Michaël Cadilhac]

address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:

> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Reiner Steib wrote:
>>
>>> How about adding PDF versions now for 22.2+ and the trunk now and
>>> decide about removing PS before releasing Emacs 23.1 (adding a note in
>>> the Makefile or FOR-RELEASE?
>>
>> Personally I think that's a waste of time and disk space.
>
> It seems that I'm the only one here willing to keep the PS files :-)
> Well, I had a longish discussion with some of my geek friends, and they
> all agreed that PS should be removed, the sooner the better.
>
> Thus, well, so be it.
>
> The patch is somewhat longer, but it's the cost to pay to have a shiny
> PDF-compliant distribution, I think.

Installed.  For the PDF files like cs-* sk-* or pl-*, I just used ps2pdf
to have them on the repository.  I've removed the PS files, too.

-- 
 |   Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac       |  Si j'étais sous-secrétaire d'État     |
 |   http://michael.cadilhac.name   |    aux choux farcis, vous entendriez   |
 |   JID/MSN:                       |  beaucoup parler des choux farcis !    |
 `----  address@hidden  |          -- Nicolas Sarkozy       -  --'

pgpXFZvsmA5Ri.pgp
Description: PGP signature