[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:24 -0500 |
> The function to check whether a command should operate on the region
> instead of whatever it normally does is now called `use-region-p'.
Perhaps a better function name could start with the `region-...' prefix
for consistency with other related functions.
That parallelism is desirable, but it is not the only factor in
choosing a good name. The name `use-region-p' seems good to me, and I
don't see a better one.
Can you suggest another name that you think is better?
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, (continued)
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/22
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/22
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/23
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/23
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/24
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/24
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/26
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/12/26
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/26
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Juri Linkov, 2007/12/27
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/28
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/22
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/23
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Miles Bader, 2007/12/25
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/17