[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Log messages in CVS
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Log messages in CVS |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:59:06 +0200 |
> From: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:45:05 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > I once posted a summary that I know about; see:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00229.html
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00234.html
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00312.html
> >
> > Richard commented here, basically approving my summary:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00276.html
>
> Ok, I've read the thread and that Richard agreed with the rules. But on
> the other hand others like Miles disagreed. Is the only purpose of
> those single file commits really to keep the CVS logs clean?
I'll let Richard reply to this question, as well as to disagreements
by Miles and others. Unlike some others, I don't care much about
whether files should or should not be committed one by one, as long as
whatever practice we adopt is adhered to by everybody.