[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:33:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>:
> > But the alternative is for speedbar and all other modes that have to
> > be VCS-aware to have their own separate lists of special
> > version-control directories. This seems wrong to me, violating what
> > database people call the SPOT (Single Point Of Truth) rule.
>
> Unfortunately we have another violation of that:
> grep-find-ignored-directories :-(
Thanks for the tip; I'll fix it.
Note to Stefan: this fix is a good idea even if we move
vc-directory-exclusion-list out of vc-hooks.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, (continued)
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/02
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/02
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/02
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/02
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/02
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/03
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/03
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/05
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/02
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored,
Eric S. Raymond <=