[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Giorgos Keramidas |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:18:31 +0200 |
On 2008-01-02 16:19, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:
>>> More than that, I think you have a copy of the whole repository
>>> locally, so you can look at logs, earlier revisions etc while
>>> off-line.
>>>
>>> That sounds useful.
>>
>> It is. All the 3Gs have this property.
>
> But I doubt all of them manage to squeeze all of Emacs' CVS history
> (actually, more than that, since the Emacs' git repository also contains
> the non-CVS multi-tty history AFAIK) into 200MB.
I have a locally converted `HEAD' from CVS -> Mercurial which contains
all the history of the Emacs trunk, and is now at 138 MB:
address@hidden:/home/keramida/hg/emacs/head$ du -skh .hg
138M .hg
address@hidden:/home/keramida/hg/emacs/head$
This repository doesn't contain *all* the branches which have ever
existed for Emacs, but a pair of branches won't really bloat the history
above 200 MB easily.
Both Git and Mercurial are trying hard to store large histories in an
efficient manner. They make different trade-offs, so some things will
invariably end up different, but there is a lot of cross-pollination
between the two systems, and that's usually a good thing :)
HTH,
Giorgos
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Piet van Oostrum, 2008/01/07
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/01
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Karl Fogel, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Romain Francoise, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like,
Giorgos Keramidas <=
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/03
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tassilo Horn, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tassilo Horn, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Óscar Fuentes, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Karl Fogel, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/01/02