[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:19:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>:
> So IMO, there's no reason to cling onto dired.
I think there are some things pushing in the other direction --
consistency of interface, mainly. I really want to hear RMS's reasons
for wanting to retain VC-Dired; it's possible he has some compelling
argument I haven't thought of.
Myself, I'm pretty near neutral on this one and willing to be
persuaded either way.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/01
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/01
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/01
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/03
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/03
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/05
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/05
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/05
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/05
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/06
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/06
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/18
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/06
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/06
- Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/06