[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: status icon support
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: status icon support |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:01:03 -0500 |
The K&R function declaration style is obsolescent in C99. This means
that compilers are allowed to reject such code or accept it with a
warning message. In either case, they aren't allowed to ignore it.
Compilers are not allowed to accept this style of declaration without
warning.
Not allowed? Nobody can stop us!
The point is that Emacs does NOT have a convention against K&R
function definitions. When Dan told Tom Tromey to rewrite to ANSI
style, he implied that that was our convention. That is not so.
I do not want to have a discussion about changing this, because there
are other, more important things to spend our time on. For instance,
a few bugs remain in Emacs 22.
- Re: RFC: status icon support, (continued)
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Jan Djärv, 2008/01/14
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/13
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/14
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14
Re: RFC: status icon support, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/01/13