[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:04:36 +1300 |
> It works. However, calling `call-process' with its second argument
> (INFILE) set to nil here might not be trivial, since at least gcc
> prints something when its input is /dev/null:
>
> $ gcc -E -dM - < /dev/null
> #define __DBL_MIN_EXP__ (-1021)
> #define __FLT_MIN__ 1.17549435e-38F
>...
Yes but we don't need these lists in buffers without associated files.
> So I think if we prefer to keep the behavior the same as previous
> (although some aspects of the previous behavior seem trivial), we
> should use a patch like the following one.
I don't think we need the old behaviour, so I've committed my patch.
Thanks for the report.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/26
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/26
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/26
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/27
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/27
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/27
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/27
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/27
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/27
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode,
Nick Roberts <=
- RE: wrong-type-argument in gud-tooltip-mode, Herbert Euler, 2008/01/27