Re: testing for a remote file to include file on a Windows mappeddrive

[Michael Albinus]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> Anyway, any objection to my proposal to clarify file-remote-p's intended
> semantics, and to add unhandled-file-name (tho maybe it should be
> called file-local-name, to make it closer to file-local-copy which is
> kind of its complement)?

Just for the records: I don't object. `file-local-name' sounds
good. And I'm also willing to provide the implementation for both
ange-ftp and Tramp, which is simple enough ...

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.