[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:44:56 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Now I'm confused. Before, i was moderately sure that the
> convention (case 3) was universal. Here is a quick survey of a
I'm not sure I understand the context of the discussion, but w.r.t user
messages, even if this convention is agreed upon, it's not a convention
about which the user would want to care.
Stefan
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, (continued)
Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, Glenn Morris, 2008/01/29
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/29
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, Glenn Morris, 2008/01/29
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/30
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, Glenn Morris, 2008/01/30
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/31
- Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message,
Stefan Monnier <=