[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: position on changing defaults?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:49:20 -0800 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I'd rather improve the general completion mechanism, than only improve
> > > it for buffer selection.
> >
> > That would be great too. But we also need to consider the fact iswitch
> > is here now, it works and is useful
>
> .... and is a completely and utterly different interface, one which is
> hated by many, and arguably is extremely confusing for newbies.
We must have different experiences: all the newbies that I've shown
iswitchb loved it. That's the main reason to propose this.
RE: position on changing defaults?, Drew Adams, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, David Kastrup, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Bastien, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?, René Kyllingstad, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/06