[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: position on changing defaults?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:30:54 -0800 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> > > .... and is a completely and utterly different interface, one which is
> > > hated by many, and arguably is extremely confusing for newbies.
> >
> > We must have different experiences: all the newbies that I've shown
> > iswitchb loved it. That's the main reason to propose this.
>
> I'm not saying that many people don't find it useful, simply that at
> first glance, if you aren't expecting it, it can be rather ... daunting.
> Of course, I suppose it's somewhat less so when one is given a personal
> introduction...
In this case the personal introduction was limited to:
"Do M-x iswitchb-mode RET and now try C-x b".
Can we generalize based on this? Maybe, maybe not, but it might be worth
a try.
- Re: position on changing defaults?, (continued)
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, René Kyllingstad, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Xavier Maillard, 2008/03/08