[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: position on changing defaults?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:40:32 -0500 |
> It also gives you the rectangle highlighting (which I think most
> users would agree is quite useful) combined with the ability to
> use the normal region kill, copy and yank keys also for rectangles.
> So there's no need to learn a different command set for rectangles!
Actually, I think the rectangle support is good, although I'd like it to
be a bit more like the normal region highlighting (e.g. same color, C-g
should deactivate it, should be allowed to have 0-width).
That is a separate feature, and a major change in Emacs's region
mechanism. It may be good, but it calls for careful discussion and
thought. We should not adopt such a change because it came along
with some other feature.
Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/08
Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/09
Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/09
CUA mode's C-RET binding [was: position on changing defaults?], Drew Adams, 2008/03/09
Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding [was: position on changing defaults?], Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/09
Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding, Miles Bader, 2008/03/09
Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding [was: position on changing defaults?], Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/09
Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding, Miles Bader, 2008/03/09
Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/09
RE: CUA mode's C-RET binding [was: position on changing defaults?], Drew Adams, 2008/03/09