Re: position on changing defaults?

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     I'm not sure I understand what you're proposing.
>     One thing we can do right now is:
>
>       (define-key function-key-map [S-up]
>       (lambda (prompt) (setq foo-shited t) [up]))
>
> It is rather kludgy to set `foo-shited' that way.
> (And can you be sure it is reliably reset to nil?
> What if you type C-g at the wrong moment?)
>
> Why do this rather than directly bind S-up to a command
> that does exactly what is wanted?


I have rechecked the relevant code - and it seems the S- checking
hacks for ttys is no longer used by cua-mode; it works to check
for the shift modifier in the current key sequence on ttys as well.

Sorry for the noise (in this specific area).

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk