[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shift-movement selection
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Shift-movement selection |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:24:46 -0400 |
> Anything that doesn't modify the buffer -- e.g. all movement commands.
Supposedly these will be changed to use the new function, so they will
explicitly deactivate the mark if the mark was activated with shift and
the movement is then performed without the shift.
I don't think we should change the behavior of the ordinary motion commands.
- Re: Shift-movement selection, (continued)
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Miles Bader, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/03/11
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/08