[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: position on changing defaults?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:24:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I am having trouble understanding that sentence, but it leads me to
> suspect we are miscommunicating. What I proposed is a command that we
> would bind certain shifted keys to. This command would look up the
> binding of the corresponding non-shifted key and call it.
Ok, that makes sense.
Now, if can make eg. C-h k S-down show the doc string for
both the shift-region effect AND for the original command,
it would be great.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: position on changing defaults?, (continued)
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: position on changing defaults?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/11
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/08
Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/08