Re: position on changing defaults?

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

Kim F. Storm wrote:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I am having trouble understanding that sentence, but it leads me to
> > suspect we are miscommunicating.  What I proposed is a command that we
> > would bind certain shifted keys to.  This command would look up the
> > binding of the corresponding non-shifted key and call it.
>
> Ok, that makes sense.
>
> Now, if can make eg. C-h k S-down show the doc string for 
> both the shift-region effect AND for the original command,
> it would be great.

Even greater would perhaps be if C-h k down also showed both too?