[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1. |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:19:48 -0400 |
I've been pretty much convinced that SYNC_INPUT should be the default.
My only doubt is about whether it leads to long delays in display updating
in situations where that would not occur without SYNC_INPUT.
I know this won't be as bad as I formerly though, but is it bad?
What have people observed?
- SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/05
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/05
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jason Rumney, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jason Rumney, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Gnus problem?, Johan Bockgård, 2008/03/11
- Re: Gnus problem?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12