[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shift-movement selection
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Shift-movement selection |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:11:52 -0400 |
Not if it is done in a separate post-post-command-hook. (And a similar
pre-pre-command-hook at other side.)
That is both ineffeciant and kludgy.
And it would, more or less, hard-wire shift, in that it would
be hard to override the "standard" meaning of shift
for any one command. Yes, you could eliminate it entirely,
but that is inflexible.
- Re: Shift-movement selection, (continued)
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Miles Bader, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/03/11
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/09