[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shift-movement selection
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Shift-movement selection |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:11:51 -0400 |
I have not properly followed the discussion. Has anybody proposed or
rejected adding some letter to the interactive string to mark
shift-sensitive movement commands? It would be reasonably easy to
interpret this in C-h k and its ilk.
That could be a good method. It has the advantage that the command
definition controls 100% of the behavior.
It is somewhat ugly that the command behaves differently depending on
what key it is bound to, but at least that happens according to a
simple system, which makes it less ugly than it might have been.
- Re: Shift-movement selection, (continued)
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, tomas, 2008/03/13
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, David Kastrup, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Thomas Lord, 2008/03/12
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Miles Bader, 2008/03/10
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: Shift-movement selection, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11