[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1. |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:35 -0400 |
Even with SYNC_INPUT, atimer functions (except poll_for_input)
may still call malloc in the signal handler context. So
emacs_blocked_malloc etc. were actually meaningful even in
SYNC_INPUT environments.
Why is that? Can it be eliminated?
- Re: Gnus problem?, (continued)
- Re: Gnus problem?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12