[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1. |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:25:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> I've used SYNC_INPUT for some months now, and I haven't noticed
> any delays.
> I think the case in which this might cause delays is if you expose part of an
> Emacs window which was hidden, while Emacs is not idle.
That's not a problem. SYNC_INPUT does not postpone X11 event processing
to the time of event processing. It just postpones it until the next
QUIT or UNBLOCK_INPUT macro. I.e. the C code constantly polls
a variable to see if a signal has arrived.
Stefan
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., (continued)
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jason Rumney, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jason Rumney, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Gnus problem?, Johan Bockgård, 2008/03/11
- Re: Gnus problem?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Jan Djärv, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/11
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., Richard Stallman, 2008/03/12
- Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/12