|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: | Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:01:59 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
AFAICT, the approach I proposed where most/all the movement commands get changed to call a special function in the interactive spec wouldn't suffer from any such problems. I think it's the best approach so far.I can not see what the advantage with an interactive spec over a property on the function name is. Could you please tell?Very simple: no magic, no pre/post-command-hook.
Why is an interactive spec less magic than the property on a function name? To the end user (non-lisper) it could be equally visible, or?
The pre-pre/post-post-command-hook I proposed has nothing to do with this, or? (I believe such a hook could be used for other emulations too, like Viper.)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |