Re: Feature request : Tab-completion for 'shell-comand'

[martin rudalics]

> I guess the (1+ (point-max)) should only be used when
> (point-max) is the really the end of the buffer, since otherwise it's
> not clear whether the overlays at (point-max) are inside or outside the
> narrowing (and since it's not clear, it's better not to remove them).

It would still be an ugly hack.  Future implementations of `overlays-in'
should be allowed to check whether its arguments constitute valid buffer
positions.