[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Bazaar repository
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Bazaar repository |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
David Ingamells <address@hidden> writes:
> When we were choosing a new CMS tool I did a similar comparison between
> mercurial and bazaar, which mercurial won easily until I discovered why:
> mercurial first uses time stamps to check for potential updates - which
> leads to lost updates if the file update happens within one second of the
> checkout. bazaar is more thorough when checking for changes - this costs
> time but is much safer.
But it shouldn't result in a 60 seconds delay.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, dhruva, 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, dhruva, 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Andreas Schwab, 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Matthieu Moy, 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/14
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Matthieu Moy, 2008/03/17
- Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Jonathan Rockway, 2008/03/14