|
From: | Richard Stallman |
Subject: | Re: Feature request : Tab-completion for 'shell-comand' |
Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:24:03 -0400 |
The doc-string of `remove-overlays' is not useful in this regard - its first sentence is silly. But `remove-overlays' relies on `overlays-in' and the latter's doc-string is precise. A zero-length overlay located at the (implicit) END arg of `remove-overlays' should _not_ get deleted unless it's located at the (implicit) BEG too. Perhaps remove-overlays should have an argument controlling how to interpret END. I think often people will want to delete zero-lenth overlays at END, and often they won't.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |