[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: very slow archive-mode
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: very slow archive-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:23:06 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
> Using a separate unibyte buffer may be a good solution, but there is one
> possible problem: it would be difficult to find this hidden separate
> buffer to kill it with the purpose to free up the memory occupied by the
> file buffer after interrupting its loading (perhaps, this buffer can be
> killed using unwind-protect during loading and kill-buffer-hook for C-x k).
> So it seems a separate unibyte buffer would be necessary only if it will
> be impossible to get the fast reading without leaving the file buffer
> in the modified state.
I installed a change to use no-convesion-multibyte for
archive files. Please try with the latest code.
> PS. Fortunately, I had a copy of the corrupted archive on a DVD,
> so nothing was lost, but nevertheless this is a damaging problem.
Hering that, I feel greatly reliaved.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- very slow archive-mode, Paul Pogonyshev, 2008/03/12
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/12
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/12
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Kenichi Handa, 2008/03/13
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/13
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/13
- Re: very slow archive-mode, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/13
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Kenichi Handa, 2008/03/13
- Re: very slow archive-mode, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/03/14
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/13
- Re: very slow archive-mode,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: very slow archive-mode, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/16