[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Word search
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Word search |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:16:56 -0700 |
Again, please use plain-text mail, not HTML mail.
From: Vincent Belaïche Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:48 PM
I am realizing that there was no mistake in the mail before the latest
one I sent, but that the mailing system has stripped off a part of it.
What I meant was "C-sxxxC-w" where instread of "xxx" I had written "RET"
between less-than and greater-than signs. But it seems that this xxx has
been stripped off by the mailing system.
Similarly I meant that I terminated the interactive search by "C-s" or
by "xxx" where xxx has the same meaning as above (a carriage return
key).
C-s does not terminate isearch. But RET (hitting `Enter') should.
The fact is that I am writing to you with Thunderbird using an
adds-on that allows to use hotmail without going through the Web
interface (it seems that there is some bug with this when HTML is used).
Please do not use an HTML mail format for this mailing list. Please find out how
to use your plug-in or Thunderbird in a way that sends plain-text mail.
> Two comments: (1) address@hidden might be a more appropriate
list.
> Consider moving this there. (2) Please use plain-text for these
mailing lists.
>
> Sorry Drew, There was a mistake in my mail, I did not mean
> "C-sC-w" but I meant "C-sC-w".
>
> What's the difference? They look the same to me.
They were not the same when I sent the mail there was RET bracketted
with LT and GT signs in between "C-s" and "C-w". So when I am sending
this mail "C-sC-w" is different from "C-sC-w"
I cannot follow you. I don't see the difference in the HTML mail you sent.
Please use plain text and type the text you want people to read.
> I tested it again and it does not work.
>
> That you for the information on the incremental word search
> ("C-sM-eC-w"). I tested it on the same node, and whether I terminate
by
> "C-s" or by "" it fails in the same way. To tell you the truth, I
> had not even tried that, as the plain non incremental one was not
> working in the first place.
>
> Not sure what you mean by terminate by "C-s" or by "".
When I sent the mail between the pair of double quotes "" there was a
RET bracketted by LT and GT signs. So when I ma sending this mail "" is
different from "".
As you can see, it doesn't appear that way. Please use plain text, not HTML.
> Does it at least work, in
> the sense that it finds what you are looking for, regardless of how
you
> terminate the search?
It does not find what I am looking for. When I type "C-sM-eC-w" I enter
Incremental word search (I can see that as on the left side of the
minibuffer is written "Word I-search"). Then if I type "the words" and
then RET I get an error message "[(wrong-type-argument
integer-or-marker-p t)]"
That sounds like a bug. Please report it using `M-x report-emacs-bug'. Describe
step by step how to reproduce the problem, starting from emacs -Q (that is, with
no .emacs).
...
More strange is the following: if I enter again the incremental word
search, and I type on the right arrow key, what happens is that the
content of the *info* buffer is copied character by character into the
minibuffer. That is to say, assume that I type 5 times on the right
arrow key, then the effect is as if I had entered the five characters
"F" "i" "l" "e" and ":" consecutively (remember that when I enter the
Word-I-search the *info* buffer point is pointing at the beginning the
text "File: emacs, Node: Word Search, Next: Regexp Search, Prev:
Nonincremental Search, Up: Search"
I believe that is normal; the text is copied from the source buffer to the
isearch edit area. You then must hit RET to accept the edited text as your
search string. Then hit C-s to search for that text.
FYI: address@hidden is for help questions. M-x report-emacs-bug is for
bug reports. address@hidden is for discussion of Emacs development.