|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: Shift selection using interactive spec |
Date: | Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:49:27 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
David Kastrup wrote:
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:David Kastrup wrote:If CUA-mode chooses to provide an additional futzing interface for meddling with external packages, this does not preclude us from using a proper interface within Emacs itself.David, thanks for the example you provided earlier of how to change the interactive form. However to me it looks like this can not be used directly. It is too complicated.What you are complaining about that there is no simple ad-hoc way to patch up functions with _separated_ code when they are not actually prepared to do the right thing. Such ad-hoc patchery can be done in a manner of ways, starting with advice over going through the interactive form.
I am sorry but it seems like you are misunderstanding the subject.
It is easy enough to write and put a _function_ in cua-mode.el, _iff_ such patchery is desired, to perform this patchery and adjust all the documentation strings appropriately in that process. Whether or not
The functionality is desired, but it should of course not go into cua-mode.el. It is important not to introduce unneeded complexity. This should be a common functionality, not something specific to cua-mode.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |