|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: Transient Mark Mode on by default |
Date: | Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:37:38 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
David Kastrup wrote:
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:David Kastrup wrote:"paul r" <address@hidden> writes:2008/3/30, M Jared Finder <address@hidden>:If you want to keep users coming to Emacs to stay with Emacs, cua-mode should be on by default.Although I hope your POV is a bit extremist as of today, I think you stated clearly the general trend. As I previously said between lines, I'm experiencing similar behaviour of people giving up emacs after a few days because of unacceptable (to them) drop in their "productivity".cua-mode will not help them much. Emacs will remain different.In contrary I think cua-mode is an excellent help for many beginners.But should we make them beginners forever?
You are making an inappropriate assumption.
That Emacs is different does not mean that cua-mode does not help.What about "much" did you not understand? At the moment I am getting rather annoyed at the amount of strawmen I perceive getting thrown at me on the Emacs list, on a variety of topics. Could be just me, but I don't remember things being that bad. It's bad enough if people pick out just a single fragment you wrote to base their arguments on. But if they pick up an invention of their own, it is quite frustrating.
There was nothing I did not understand.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |