Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
>     address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:20:47 +0900
> 
> Jan Djärv writes:
> 
>  > In recode they have "surfaces".  So charset is separate from surfaces, for 
>  > example EOL convention.  That would be nice to have in Emacs as well.
> 
> Do you know how recode's terminology maps to Unicode TR #17?

AFAIU, what `recode' calls ``surface'' is a Transfer Encoding Syntax
(TES) in UTR #17 parlance.