Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs

[Stefan Monnier]

>> vc-dir (previous "vc-status") is very much a work in progress, as you've
>> seen.
> In that case, do you think premature to remove vc-directory which was better
> at doing some of the things vc-dir should do?

AFAIK, it has the same "commit in foreground" and "no way to update the
whole direcrory" problem.  VC-dir is missing some features, but which
ones (other than the obvious ones from dired which probably won't be
added to vc-dir anyway) were present in vc-dired?


        Stefan


PS: Has vc-dired been removed already?