[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:30:18 +0300 |
Here's an example of a typical compilation command line on Windows:
gcc -I. -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400 -D_X86_=1 -c -gstabs+ -g3
-mtune=pentium4 -O2 -Di386 -D_CRTAPI1=_cdecl -Demacs=1 -DWINDOWSNT -DDOS_NT
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../nt/inc -D_UCHAR_T -DHAVE_NTGUI=1 -DUSE_CRT_DLL=1 -o
oo-spd/i386/dispnew.o dispnew.c
This uses a lot -f -DSOMETHING switches, and it looks like most of
these are not needed, and almost all the rest can be put on
src/s/ms-w32.h. Can someone help understanding the purpose of each
switch?
Below I summarize what I gleaned from grepping fo each symbol in the
Emacs sources and in the system headers:
WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -- needed to produce a leaner executable
_WIN32_WINNT -- needed to prevent accidental use of features
unavailable on older Windows versions we still
support
_X86_ -- not needed, defined automatically by MinGW
headers
i386 -- not needed
_CRTAPI1 -- used only in sysdep.c, can be replaced by a
literal _cdecl
WINDOWSNT -- needed for W32-specific code in Emacs
DOS_NT -- needed for code that is specific to both DOS
and W32 ports
_UCHAR_T -- not needed
HAVE_NTGUI -- can be replaced with WINDOWSNT, since the W32
build doesn't use any other GUI
USE_CRT_DLL -- looks like it's unneeded, since we never use
anything but the CRTDLL.dll runtime
(I've omitted the -DHAVE_CONFIG_H and -Demacs, which are common to all
platforms.)
Does someone know anything that contradicts the above? If not, I
think we should remove those defines that are not needed anymore, and
put those which are needed in ms-w32.h.
Comments?
- Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/26