[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:33:53 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:02:20 +0200
>
>
> I just wanted to report that the declaration of "abort" in glibc is not
> going to be changed to be more compatible with debugging.
>
> <URL:http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6522> shows my
> report and its resolution.
Sigh. I concluded a long time ago that it is useless to ask GCC and
glibc developers to cater to debugging needs. At best, you are
ignored; but more often you are flamed back into silence. I'm sorry
that you, David, wasted your effort as well on this.
- Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/15
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14