Re: address@hidden: bug#496: Info received (bug#496: 23.0.60; ispell-word becomes increasingly slower)]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: Don Armstrong <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:09:58 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > And why do I get 3 copies of the below?
> 
> When you reply to a bug, you should only have two addresses present:
> 
> i) the submitter
> ii) address@hidden
> 
> (basically, respect the Reply-To header.)

I use Rmail's `r' command, which AFAIK does respect Reply-To.

> In your recent replies to bugs, you also had:
> 
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
>       address@hidden
> 
> I don't know where these came from.

Hey, I just hit `r' in Rmail.  If someone thinks that Rmail does
something wrong, please tell what that is, and let's fix it.  It's
silly to have an Emacs bug tracker that is incompatible with Emacs's
own MUA.

> To not get tracker acknowldgements, add a header X-Debbugs-No-Ack:,
> with any value, to any message you send.
> 
> To ignore most tracker control messages, discard anything matching:
> 
> ^X-Emacs-PR-Message: transcript

Thanks, but I'd like to see the nuisance go away without any
additional burden for me.