Re: tramp+recentf: persistent errors due to expand-file-name

[Michael Albinus]

David Reitter <address@hidden> writes:

> Generally, I do think it is prudent to guard against errors being
> signaled when running code from hooks so that users don't end up in a
> (to them) non-recoverable situation.  You'll know best where the right
> place is...

Generally: yes.

But Tramp does not know that it runs from a hook, so it might be
better to protect the code which evaluates the hook.

> - D

Best regards, Michael.