Re: Rmail-mbox branch

[Evil Boris]

Evil Boris <address@hidden> writes:

> But there is a more general problem with this:  I do not like losing
> data or making irreversible changes.  If the said msg contained another
> alternative (say, HTML) that I later would discover contained some
> information I needed, I am not sure how easy it would be to get it
> back.  Maybe I am just being paranoid.

Forgot an important point (of course): After such a manipulation
[undoing quoted-printable- or base64-encoded msg and hand-decoding it],
is it clear that the file is a legitimate mbox file, usable by other
applications?  Or is this not one of the design goals of Rmail-mbox?

--Boris