[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts |
|
Date: |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:57:35 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> What does :lang really mean, anyway?
Fontconfig has it's own database to decide which font is for
which language. The database maps each language to a set of
characters that a font must support to claim that the font
is for that langauge.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- japanese vs. chinese fonts, Miles Bader, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Miles Bader, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Miles Bader, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/02
- Re: japanese vs. chinese fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/02