[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:25:49 +0200 |
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:17:57 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Ah, it's not a bug of composition, but a bug of scan_words
> (syntax.c). Currently U+301 is labeled as `latin' script,
> and the surrounding characters there are `cyrillic' script.
> Thus, that funciton thinks that there's a word boundary.
> I'll find a way to solve this problem.
I think we will need a user option to control whether scan_words stops
on script boundaries, see the discussion started by Miles yesterday
about a similar problem.
- Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property, Juri Linkov, 2008/10/19
- Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/20
- Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property, Juri Linkov, 2008/10/21
- Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/22
- Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/22
- Re: find-composition still depends on the composition property, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/22
- Word boundary (was: find-composition still depends on the composition property), Juri Linkov, 2008/10/23
- Re: Word boundary (was: find-composition still depends on the composition property), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/25
- Re: Word boundary (was: find-composition still depends on the composition property), Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/26
- Re: Word boundary (was: find-composition still depends on the composition property), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/26
- Re: Word boundary, Miles Bader, 2008/10/26
- Re: Word boundary, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/26