[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:19:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> Setting vc-handled-backends to nil should indeed stop VC from doing
>> those directory walks. So now I don't understand why the walks done by
>> VC are so much cheaper than the ones done by locate-dominating-file.
>> Could it be that all the files you opened were under CVS control (so
>> the VC search stops before having to walk up the directories)?
> Eventually found vc-find-root. So - it versus locate-dominating-file ?
> While they're doing a fairly similar job, they do look to me like they're
> implemented importantly differently -locate-dominating-file takes a regex
> and passes it to directory-files for each directory. AFAICS directory-files
> scans the whole directory each time through for the match. OTOH,
> vc-find-root just tests if /path/to/directory/witness exists. The former is
> rather slower and (I think) consier. I'm not sure that there's any real
> performance problem with directory-files itself for what it actually does,
> though maybe it could be made faster. Maybe not worthwhile though - easier
> to rewrite locate-dominating-file to not use it as below...
Thanks for you investigative work. locate-dominating-file used a regexp
for searches for multiple files (e.g. I intended to merge the N calls to
vc-find-root into a single call to locate-dominating-file), but from
your measurements, it seems that unless we're searching for an
open-ended set of files we're better off with multiple calls to
vc-find-root, so I think we should indeed change locate-dominating-file
to use a fixed name. This will also have the advantage that we should
be able to use it directory for VC and hence get rid of vc-find-root.
I've installed a change which should do just that.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, (continued)
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/25
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Miles Bader, 2008/10/22
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/10/23
Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/22
Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/10/22