Re: Word boundary

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>> What would the practical effect of that be?  Would it break filling in 
>>> Japanese?
> >
> > I think no.  Filling is related to line-breaking, and it
> > should be treated differently from word-breaking.

> Er, for "filling", read "word movement".

If "that" in "the practical effect of that" means to add
user option to control word-breaking at script boundry on
and off, of course, M-f (forward-word) and M-b
(backward-word) will be affected by it.

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden