[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Oop customization group
From: |
MON KEY |
Subject: |
Re: Oop customization group |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:21:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> can be done incrementally. General suggestions for useful categories
> would be welcome (both category name and clear description of what it
> shoujld contain). We could start with `major-mode' (which I'd constrain
> to be modes for use in files-buffers) and `minor-mode'.
The best approach remains to mirror/reflect the structure of the
emacs/elisp manuals ITR esp. as this allows for reasonable and extensibl
xrefs to source and documentation going forward.
The 'delicious tags' approach is _not_ TRT here, nor is a strict class
hiearchy 'multiple inhertiance' or otherwise. TRT is a thesaurus in the
z39.50 sense. Zthes offers a nice set of docs, tagsets, schemas,
attribute sets, etc. for such an implentation see (URL
`http://zthes.z3950.org/z3950/zthes-z3950-1.0.html#2.5')
The CQL, SRU, Soap, interfaces could afford mutiple paths to a
controlled _and_ open 'tagset' in the cataloger/indexer sense as opposed
to the "gee I better tag this library for custom" use that emacser's
tend to employ.
Why is it that programmers believe they make good classifiers?
s_P